For Public Review: Unnamed job hunter 17

Welcome to crowd-sourced resume review for LIS job hunters!

Please help the job hunter below by using the comment button to offer constructive criticism on her resume. Some guidelines for constructive feedback are here, and the ALA NMRT has brief tips for reviewing resumes here.

This 2 page resume was submitted by a job hunter who says,

 This is a resume that I am using to apply for cataloging, user services, and reference positions, mainly at academic libraries but also a few public libraries.

 

unnamed job hunter 17_1unnamed job hunter 17_2

To submit your resume or CV For Public Review,

  • send it as a Word document, PDF, PNG or JPEG to hiringlibrariansresumereviewATgmail.
  • It will be posted as-is, so please remove any information that you are not comfortable having publically available (I suggest removing your address and phone number at a minimum).
  • Please include a short statement identifying if it’s a resume or CV and
  • describing the types of positions you’re using it for (ie institution type, position level, general focus).
  • Finally, you will also need to confirm that you agree to comment on at least five other posted resumes.
About these ads

6 Comments

Filed under For Public Review, Resume Review

6 responses to “For Public Review: Unnamed job hunter 17

  1. It seems like you have a lot of relevant experience and I would probably definitely give your resume a look if I were a hiring manager. One thing I noticed is that you included the month and year for your previous positions but you didn’t include it for your former ones. You should include the month and year so that employers can get a better idea of how long you worked for your former employers.

  2. Sylvia Nurse

    I think you should move the Technology Skills section to the top of your resume and tailor it for each job application.

    If possible quantify your resume. Read this:

    http://lifehacker.com/use-range-frequency-or-scale-to-quantify-your-resume-1579460785?utm_campaign=socialflow_lifehacker_twitter&utm_source=lifehacker_twitter&utm_medium=socialflow

  3. You have an impressive resume, with the experience listed hitting all the relevant job interest areas. However, you may want to use this as your “base” resume, which you can revise and edit to tailor it to specific jobs you are applying for. Also, you may also want to include relevant course work do show that you are interested in learning beyond your current level of experience. Finally, I agree with Monique, consider using more specific dates (month AND year). But again, a very impressive resume!

  4. Dani-El

    Very Solid–for a new MLS, you bring a lot that is solid and relevant to the table. The document is well laid out and flows well. I won’t repeat the date stuff mentioned above. I’d delete the mention of English under language skills as that is obvious. You might move the Tech Skills up to the top and mention some other skill and experiences such as the conference presentation, just to make yourself stand out more. I hope our paths cross or we get to work together!

  5. As the others have said, you have a lot of great experience for a new MLS. You need to expand and lead on that instead of with your Music educational background which is not relevant to most of the positions you’re applying for.

    Create an Accomplishments section where you can highlight the most impressive and interesting things you did in any of your positions and put that up top. You’ll want to keep a master list of those and delete the ones not relevant for the particular position you’re applying for. They should still be mentioned in less detail under the relevant previous job so they’ll still be there if anyone looks for them. Look at the skills asked for in the job description and make sure you address as many of them as possible in Accomplishments so people can stop reading there and still know that you’re qualified.

  6. Taylor V.

    Great content, great layout, great skills! You’re a triple threat.

    In addition to the comments posted previously, I think you should (re)consider where you place the Projects section. While it’s a nice feature, it’s difficult to determine if this is (a) duplicate content [see Library Work Experience, 2012-2014 "Designed LibGuides and Pinterest pages..."] or (b) if this is work conducted as part of a course. As such, you may want to be a bit more explicit regarding the projects or consider merging them into more appropriate sections.

    Best of luck!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s