Category Archives: Op Ed

Further Answers: How Did Prop 13 Affect You?

This is a long post, but hopefully you’ll be as fascinated as I am.

I graduated in May of 2011, for a while I felt like I’d landed in the worst possible job market for a new librarian. Entry level positions are scarce, and there seems to be a ravening horde of experienced librarians so desperate for work that they’re taking these precious few spots.

Things could never have been this tough, right?

Then I started working in substitute pools for three different public library systems. Librarians are generally nice, and I began to hear, in each system, sympathetic stories from those who empathized with new grads, because they’d been through the aftermath of Prop 13.

In 1978, Californians engaged in taxpayer revolt. More than 60% of the state voted for Proposition 13, which decreased property taxes. This legislation made it so property value (the amount used to calculate property tax) is assessed at time of purchase, and can not increase more than 2% each year. For both personal and commercial property. It also requires a two-thirds vote for increases in both state and local taxes. I read a lot about it on the librarian’s dirty little secret, but there have been recent murmurings about reform, so you can find some good news articles about it right now as well.

It has had some pretty disastrous ramifications for schools and libraries. Before Prop 13, California was one of top school systems in the country. Now we are ranked 48th. I don’t have a neat statistical fact to describe its affect on libraries (and really, correlation is not causation, so theoretically our school ranking could be the result of other factors). What I do have, are some stories collected from librarians affected by Prop 13. I asked them:

Can you describe how you were affected by Prop 13? Were you laid off or did you have hours reduced? How long did it take to return to work? Did you return to the same level and hours as before you left? Can you see any similarities or differences between what it was like then, and what the library job market is like today?

I couldn’t resist sending my experience. I applied to library school in 1980, I think. I wish I still had the letter I received from UC Berkeley’s School of Library and Information Studies. As I remember it, the letter implied ‘if you are even accepted to this graduate program, you will be even more lucky to get a job due to Prop 13.’ I was accepted to the MLIS program and graduated. My first job in records management was followed a year later by my first librarian job as a children’s librarian. I did have to move to southern California for the public library position. I remember that Oakland Public Library was recruiting substitute/temporary librarians around the same time but I didn’t qualify for their list.

- Julia Reardon, Branch Manager, La Palma Branch, OC Public Libraries

blairProp 13 caused a bump down effect at the library I worked at.

I began working in the library field in 1959 at a Los Angeles County branch as a page. Moved to another branch as a library aid. From there to the Pomona Public Library as a circulation clerk. During those times I was going to college part time and doing a lot of the work as a professional librarian without the benefits. Finally got my bachelor’s degree & enrolled in library school at USC while working at San Bernardino County branch as a librarian trainee. Finally got my MSLS from USC & went to work at the Indio Branch of the Riverside City/County Library System. That is where I was when Prop 13 hit. I as a children’s librarian filling the last created Librarian position. When Prop 13 came, my position was the first to be eliminated. As I stated earlier, this caused the bump down affect. I finally moved on to the Colton Public Library where I retired from in 2000.

I loved working in the library field. The one regret I have is not having gotten my MSLS earlier.

The only similarity is the loss of staff due to the loss of revenue. I had to move in order to keep my job.

People today don’t realize the tremendous affect Prop 13 has had over the years to library services.

- Blair Holm, Children’s Librarian

The effects of Prop 13 on me were several.

During all this I worked as a Library Assistant II for the Alameda County Library. LA II’s then were more like librarians than clerks, except we were paid less than genuine, certificate-bearing librarians.

Lots of anxiety before passage of Prop 13. After passage, feelings of resignation and then registering for unemployment benefits. Some relief when rehired (only about one month after being rehired). Resentment, directed (only in my feelings) at the public and those who fought for passage of Prop 13.

I worked half-time for a few months after being rehired, at the Castro Valley branch of the Alameda County Library. More staff (most of those laid off) came back to work and I then worked full-time, as a Branch Manager (Library Assistant III) at a small branch of the Alameda County Library.

I was also studying at San Jose State for my library degree (MLS), which I received in 1980.

I see little difference in the library job market today and before Prop 13. It’s still hard to get a job as a librarian. ( I believe the 1990′s was an easier time to get a library job.) I got my first full-time job as a librarian (with San Mateo County Library) in 1985 after five years of searching. I worked
as a part-time librarian before that (starting in the early 1980s) at the Weekend Library Line (Late-night telephone reference service for the Bay Area, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. I worked one night a week. A story for another survey.)

-Jay Smith, Reference Librarian, San Carlos Library 

I worked in a rural county library in northern California when Prop 13 passed in June, 1978.

Our main library (in the county seat) had been open 6 days a week, and was immediately reduced to 4 days a week.

Our county library (main library, three branches, and a bookmobile) was funded by a dedicated tax rate. Before the June election, we did an analysis with the County Auditor and estimated that we would lose more than 20% of our funding, if the measure passed.

Later that summer/early fall, after the State Legislature released additional state funds to the counties, we were able to re-open the main library to 5 days a week.

All the staff took a 20% pay cut during this time (I recall it lasted a few months), except for me. I was the County Librarian and, apparently, there was some section of the state law that prevented the county from reducing my salary, since I was a County officer.

So I would come to work on Fridays, when the library was closed, and do the regular morning tasks (clear the book drop, process the mail and magazines, search for books which had been requested by patrons in other libraries in our 6-county system–these requests came to us every morning on a TWX machine–etc.)

I would also do whatever administrative paperwork (paying claims, reconciling expenditures, etc.) that had piled up during the week, and would walk up to the court house (which was open on Fridays) to make the cash deposit, file the claims, etc. And chat and listen to those county officials who were closer to the powers-that-be to find out what was being discussed and considered as options for all the county departments.

The cuts of Prop 13 were very demoralizing. They were demoralizing to our staff, some of whom left library employment altogether (the bookmobile driver was laid off, because the bookmobile service was eliminated when Prop 13 passed. When the bookmobile service was restored, he declined to return to his former position.)

They were demoralizing to the public, because the county library system was a recently created service, and they appreciated the resources of a system, the access to books outside of their library, the helpful staff, the decent hours of service, etc.

It was demoralizing statewide in a variety of ways. Prop 13 de-stablized funding for a number of the rural county libraries, many of which were funded from their County’s general fund. (Remember: we had a dedicated library tax rate. Not every county library was funded in this way.) One county library–Lassen–later closed down completely. Another county was so pruned back that they later turned to a private operator to offer a modicum of better service.

On similarities or differences between what it was like then, and what the library job market is like today: In 1978, with the passage of Proposition 13, almost every library in California was facing a cut in revenue, and the uncertainty was spread throughout the state. As background, you have to understand the differences in how libraries were governed and funded. California law provided for county libraries, city libraries, city-county libraries, special district libraries, school district library districts, and joint powers agencies that provided library services. Some county libraries were considered special districts for funding purposes and had a separate library tax. Some county and city libraries were funded from their jurisdiction’s general fund, which meant that they were in competition with many other programs, including law enforcement and fire services, for a share of that money.

In today’s environment, we have some jurisdictions that are doing better than others in terms of recovery from the recession. A jurisdiction with a lot of high-priced homes, an auto mall, and a regional shopping center with a Nordstrom’s as an anchor store is probably doing better than a jurisdiction with a lot of 99-cent stores and store-front churches on their Main Street.

In addition, the number of library school graduates in California in the class of 1978 is different from today’s picture. In 1978, there were ALA-accredited library schools at UC Berkeley, UCLA, and the University of Southern California. The program at San Jose State was focused on training school librarians. At that point, they were not engaged in the distance-education programs and large enrollments that are the hallmarks of their operation today.

There are hopeful signs for library service (and for hiring new librarians) in my opinion.

Librarians are doing a better job in their communities demonstrating the value of what they offer. We are using social media to our advantage in reaching those who are informed by those methods. The move to electronic books is an opportunity to promote our collections to new users who may rarely set foot in the library building. The renewed emphasis on services to children is a good hook to lure in the next generation of adults who may not have been regular library users in many years. Robust services to immigrant populations are showing parents about the importance of reading and libraries for their children, especially if they are from countries without a tradition of public library services.

The two library bond issues that passed in California raised the bar on what a modern library building should look like, and the application process introduced a number of best practices to any community that is looking at new construction or remodeling projects.

That said, I am concerned about the library school graduates who are still looking for work. I hope that they remain involved in the profession, even if their employment takes them to something other than a library-based career. I hope that they are flexible and are willing to gain experience in a community that is not on their radar screen at the moment, or take a position where they will be challenged in ways that are different from their “ideal” job.
-Anonymous

Brian ReynoldsI was working as a Reference/Catalog Librarian at the Shasta County Library in 1978. Pretty soon after the passage of Prop. 13 my work week and pay was reduced by 20%…a five-day week became a four-day week. This reduction lasted for only a few months, fortunately. I retained my rank and salary throughout. To maintain my income, I went back to waiting tables at a local restaurant…a job I had done in college.

I see similar conditions today where many public libraries have had their budgets cut…due to shortfalls in local funding and reductions in State funding. Our own Library has lost about a dozen positions via attrition but has been fortunate not to have to lay off any staff. Many other public libraries in California have not been so fortunate.

There is a strong perception that public libraries are obsolete, nice but not necessary. I believe this falsehood affects staff morale, staff recruitment, and customer attitudes…especially for people who use a public library only rarely. Why support an agency that is, or will soon become, obsolete? Of course, none of this is accurate but the perception is widespread nonetheless. Many people with whom I have spoken who are interested in librarianship as a profession wonder if it’s a good choice. I assure them that it is, but sometimes it’s an uphill battle.
-Brian A. Reynolds, Library Director

In 1978, I was working half time at Santa Clara County (Los Altos), 18 hours a week (so they didn’t have to pay benefits) at Sunnyvale, and on-call at Mountain View Public. Election Day was June 10th and Proposition 13 passed by a wide margin as I recall. I was one of six librarians laid off at Sunnyvale (case of “last in, first out”). Since I needed a full time job to support myself and my daughter, I had to resign my half time position at the County. Prop 13 went into effect on July 1st so I needed to find ANY job fast. From 1978 to 1992, when I became full time at Mountain View, I worked as a Secretary, at a Sales Order Administration position for a laser company ( Coherent), and as a Technical Documents Librarian at an aerospace company (Lockheed) while continuing as an hourly librarian at Mountain View.

I graduated from SJSU in 1975 and through a personal connection, got the hourly job at Mountain View, which was very lucky. It took another 3 years to find the other positions. It was the old story – without experience, you couldn’t get a job and without a job, you couldn’t get experience. Santa Clara County at that time was giving THE test and you got on a list. They finally got to me 3 years later. Once I had that job, the Sunnyvale job came almost at once. These days, I gather, things are much the same, in that openings are few and far between. Public libraries have had to cut hours and positions and salaries, and cutting staff by attrition and not filling vacancies because of the economy.
-Betsy Carlson, Adult Services Librarian, Mountain View Public Library

In 1993, after a series of annual false alarms, a change in statewide funding protocols called the “ERAF shift” led to funding shortfalls at a number of county libraries in California. This was basically a delayed reaction to Proposition 13. I was laid off from Contra Costa County Library after having worked there full-time as a Library Specialist (roughly equivalent to a Librarian II) for over four years.

On returning to work: I was fortunate and was able to return to full-time work (at Oakland Public Library) after just a couple of weeks of unemployment. It was a very competitive hiring environment, since I was competing against other laid-off experienced librarians from other county systems. I was hired into a comparable classification (Librarian II at Oakland, Library Specialist at Contra Costa) but I took a significant pay cut because I was back at Step 1 pay. Some time later, Contra Costa offered to hire me back from their layoff list, but I decided to stay at Oakland and I’m still here.

On similarities or differences between what it was like then, and what the library job market is like today: I’ve been in the field long enough now to see the job market go up and down several times. I’m not following it as closely as I might be these days, but my sense is that things are a bit better for applicants now than a couple of years ago, though it’s still a better market for employers than for applicants.

- Daniel Hersh, Supervising Librarian for Support Services, Oakland Public Library

I can tell you that Prop 13 meant that my first job was a very low paying private school part-time gig, and that when Prop 13 hit city library budgets (a year or two after it passed), I was laid off from a city library. I was rehired a few months later when someone left.

In general, because of Prop 13 and strained state budgets, cuts came to libraries in bad times. My next layoff was from a county system in 1993. Incredible numbers of branch managers like myself were laid off and then competed for the few jobs left. (I was rehired within a month by a CITY library, as were several other former experienced librarians from affected counties.) I’d have hated to be a newly-minted librarian at that time!
-Anonymous

Cindy MediavillaWhen I graduated from library school in 1977, I was immediately hired by the Glendale Public Library, where I had interned as a student. My job, which was funded by the Comprehensive Employment & Training Act (CETA), consisted of working part-time as the “services to shut-ins” librarian, where I took books to homebound community members. The rest of my 40 hours a week were spent working on the various branch and central library reference desks.

Prop 13 passed at the end of my first year working as a professional librarian. Since I was in a grant-funded position, I was the first person in the library to be laid-off. Another entry-level (non-grant-funded) librarian was also laid-off.

On returning to work: After maybe 3-4 months of being unemployed, I finally got a job in downtown L.A. at Price Waterhouse, where I worked part-time as a cataloger. I had interned at Glendale as a cataloger, so was familiar with the process. At that time (1978), Price Waterhouse had a one-room special library filled with monographs all classified according to Dewey (mostly in the 600s). I was hired to reclassify the books according to a customized system created by Price Waterhouse. I was not enamored of the work, but it was a job, so I didn’t complain. The worst part was commuting to downtown L.A. from Long Beach, where I was living at the time.

In late spring 1979, I applied for a full-time Librarian I job at the Alhambra Public Library. The head of reference there knew my former boss at Glendale and so I was hired roughly a year after being laid-off. I no longer remember, but believe the pay was about the same, but I had much more responsibility at Alhambra. I stayed there for three years.

On similarities or differences between what it was like then, and what the library job market is like today: I see lots of similarities between the job situation in the late 1970s and the situation today. I was also laid-off in 1993 during our last economic recession. Personally, that was a lot more devastating in that I had a lot of family obligations, plus we lost our house. Still, professionally, I was able to find temporary employment right away and was back to full time within 6 months.

Today, the employment picture is lot more bleak. Many of my students end up being unemployed for one or two years after graduation. This is the worst it’s been since Proposition 13. In fact, it may even be worse today: lots of competition for so few library jobs. It breaks my heart that my students–many of whom are stellar–can’t find jobs.
- Cindy Mediavilla, Library Programs Consultant, California State Library, and Lecturer, UCLA Department of Information Studies

Maybe this way; I watched it happen, and it was gradual as the state slowly contracted; first nothing then on and on with cuts. The unfinished highway projects, like in front of SFO the freeway to nowhere for years. The state robbing the counties and the cities for property tax money and the different impound accounts…sigh.

The school librarians were the hardest hit, but it was not overnight. So the statue law says the schools have to have a library, not that they have to staff it. If you live in Chappaqua, New York you pay $ 12,000 property tax on a $200,000 house in the 80’s and a further $18,000 in school taxes(no I didn’t make a mistake). Property owners don’t want to pay for things they don’t decide on, or they don’t perceive as value for money. I was the last generation where fiction was put around non-fiction on the shelving because it was worth less, and the librarians told you what you could take out-literally the public librarians told an older teen that book is not for you.

Whole generations were alienated at the library and then by Pat Brown’s then Regan then Jerry Brown’s public policies and wanted spending to stop so then you had Prop.13. By the way I am very liberal, but I saw how it went down. I heard people complain; people who spent $55,000 on a house and all of sudden after 6 years were paying $4,000 a year taxes a percentage lower than New York, but still high compared with the value of the house, and salaries here were lower on the left coast.
-Anonymous

Joni BodartI was a YA librarian in the Bay Area when Prop 13 was passed. I had been fortunate to change jobs just six months before, going from Alameda County Library to Stanislaus County Free Library, and as a result, did not lose my job when ACL closed all its branches. The director in Modesto was determined not to lay off any full time professional staff, so did other cuts. But I can still remember how devastating it was for my friends still at ACL, and how they struggled to support themselves.
-Joni Richards Bodart, Associate Professor, School of Library and Information Science, San Jose State University

In February 1977 I started graduate school to become a librarian. In March 1977 I was hired as a librarian for the Buena Park Library District. At the time they did not require a library degree for librarian but they were looking to upgrade the standards. I was very fortunate to be able to work as a librarian during library school and being able to apply what I learned. I was also very fortunate working for BPLD. As and entry librarian, they had me working in every department giving me well-rounded experience to go with the degree. After Prop 13 passed, I was one of the first to be laid off. I still had a year of library school to finish, but need to work full-time.

I had a friend in library school that had already graduated and was running a small business setting up libraries for business. She also maintained these libraries. She hired me as a cataloguer. This was part time work that I did at home and I was able to speed up my graduation by taking more classes a semester. Later that year I was able to get a part-time reference librarian job at Santa Ana Public Library. I worked both part-time jobs until I graduated in 1980, the last graduating class from the Cal State Fullerton Library School.

It was a difficult time to start this career, there were hundreds of applications for new jobs. So I count myself very lucky to have gained the experience I did while going to library school.

After graduation I moved out of state and worked in a small community college library for about 5 years before moving back to California. I worked for the same library company. This time actually going to the libraries to maintain them. Later I taught at a small Christian school in San Clemente, setting up a library for the school that help get the school accredited. In 1994, someone took a chance on me, once a again, and I started work for OC Public Libraries as an extra help librarian and then as a children’s librarian. In 2004 I promoted to senior branch manager. In 2008 started my current position at the El Toro Library.

My advice to students working on a library degree is to get library experience, even if you have to volunteer. This gives you the edge when you send in an application and/or resume and go to the interview. It will show you if you will like this work. The more experience you have, the easier it is to find a job.

I have been a librarian for 38 years now and have never ever regretted it. I became a librarian because is knew I would be challenged, learn something every day, and provide an essential service to people. It has never been boring and to this day I never know what the day will hold.
- Grace M. Barnes, Senior Branch Librarian,El Toro Library, Laguna Woods Library


If you’re anything like me, and I’m sure we could be twinsies, politics generally put you straight to sleep. But here’s the thing: our work, even if we are academic, or special librarians, is so dependent on the political system. Not just for funding, which is our life blood, but in order to fulfill our missions of promoting things like intellectual freedom, and literacy. I’m trying real hard to keep my eyes open.

I want to take this opportunity to share a few pertinent links with you:

  • Everylibrary is a Political Action Committee (PAC) for libraries. They are running a summer internship, in partnership with Hack Library School. Deadline to apply is March 15.
  • National Library Legislative Day is an ALA event in Washington D.C. that seeks to drum up federal money for libraries. If you know a non-librarian library supporter, they can win an award to attend on a travel stipend.
  • Finally, March 15 is also the deadline to apply for ALA’s Google Policy Fellowship. The Fellow will spend 10 weeks in Washington D.C. researching library and information policy.

If you were affected by the passing of Prop 13, or the ERAF shift, please feel free to join the discussion in the comment section.

If your state has had a similar experience with crippling legislation, please contact me – let me know if you’d like to put together a post about it.

Thanks, as always, for reading. Today’s other post is a discussion of “Is it the worst time ever to be a new library grad?” so if you’ve got opinions about that, please click through and comment there.

1 Comment

Filed under Further Answers, Op Ed

A Brief Interlude of Ranting by Emily

This is my response to the person whose survey response is here. As I said in the intro to that post, I go back and forth sometimes about how vocal to be on this blog.  I’m really interested in getting a variety of viewpoints, and in providing a forum for people to be honest.  I don’t want to discourage people from sharing their perspectives by being disrespectful or discouraging to the respondents. That being said, I also have a viewpoint, and to be totally honest, this respondent made me mad.  So I’m going to go ahead and comment on this one. If you are considering taking one of the surveys, please don’t let my scathing wit scare you away.  I’m grateful really.

 

Dude.

I don’t know if you actually are a pompous jerk, or if you’re just coming across as one due to being a poor communicator. Let me address three of your responses.

1. In regards to your PhD:

Here are a few articles about PhDs on food stamps
NPR
HuffPo
Chronicle of Higher Education

Please note that during the recession the number of PhDs on food stamps more than tripled, while the number of Master’s on food stamps only nearly tripled. Are you really being picky, or are you just not facing the fact that your PhD may not provide you any particular advantage in the job market?

I applaud your hard work, and honestly I believe that education is always enriching, even if it doesn’t land you a job. I think more people should go for PhDs and that people who have them should be congratulated. But be real.

2. In regards to your declining to name your job ad sources:
Personally, I’m not looking for the same kind of work that you are, so I don’t need your sources. INALJ probably already has your sources. I asked Naomi how many she had and she said:

wow- it is in the hundreds I think- I assign 64 to senior editors, then roughly 5-15 for states editors (each) plus listservs… I will be tabulating it all for the Feb 4th launch of my new INALJ states pages. I also instruct the editors to Use The Source url (do not go hunting for a better job link, if you found it on ALAJobList or MPLA then give them credit by using their link) Something I feel strongly about

Isn’t she collegial and generous? Anyway, if you read this blog, please stop. If you want to take advantage of free resources that are founded on the idea of people being willing to share information and experiences, you gotta share too.

3. In regards to your comments about the survey:
Fair play. I’m not a researcher, and I don’t have a PhD. I do pilot my surveys by sending them to test subjects, but this is pretty informal so I don’t worry too much about how scientifically valid my data is. I do like to improve. If you want to make specific suggestions, that would be helpful. Telling me to consult a survey design expert is not. It’s just kind of snarky.

Ok, I’m done.  Sorry. The survey is still open, by the way, so if you want to see if you can out snark this last person, and get me all fired up again, well, CHALL-ANGE!

10 Comments

Filed under Job hunter's survey, Op Ed

Help Wanted, and Other Blog Admin

Hello Friends,

Remember how that last Stats and Graphs post for the Job Hunter survey was based on 360 responses?  In fact, as of 1/27/2013 we had increased to 377 responses. Add that in to the majority of 234 responses to the What Should Candidates Wear? survey, as well as all of the other various posts I want to do, and I’m looking at some logistical issues.

You may have noticed that I’m posting more frequently – I’ve been doing about two a day.  I’ve realized that I need to step it up if you’re going to get a chance to see everything in a timely fashion.  If you’re getting this by email, and I’m clogging up your inbox, I’m sorry!  I read all of my blogs by feedreader for just this reason.

I’ve also decided to find someone to help put this thing together.  I’m looking for someone to do two things, one of which might be kind of boring and one of which might be kind of exciting: to help transcribe surveys, and to create a good index to the posts.  I’d like to make it easier for people to find content, and I’d like to provide a structured listing of the post titles. I’d also like to spend less time transcribing surveys. Here are the details:

  • You must be willing to commit to spend a minimum of four hours a week on this project.
  • You must know how to work in Google Spreadsheets, Google Docs, and WordPress.
  • You must know how to parse HTML.  You don’t have to write it, you just have to understand how it works and maybe know a few of the more common tags.
  • You must know how to create a good index. You should have either a project you can share with me, or coursework, or both.  I don’t know much about it, so you’re going to be the expert.
  • You must be able to work well with me virtually, and be a good email communicator.
  • You must be committed to maintaining the confidentiality of survey respondents.
  • Bonus Points: Being an expert at analyzing and presenting data using Excel. You know, making charts and stuff.

If you are interested, please fill out this form.  I will keep it open for a week, then I will shut it down to look at the responses. I will give you an update within one week.

If you want to be considered, you need to fill out the form by Midnight (PST) on January 27th, 2013.

Please don’t send me anything else, just fill out the form.

I’m sorry that I’m just looking for one person right now.  To be honest, I’m nervous about letting someone mess around with my blog-baby.

I’m sorry that there is no money at all to pay you.  This blog costs me money to run as it is, and I’m an underemployed librarian.

If you have questions, please leave a comment.  You should be able to do this totally anonymously.

YOUR PAL,

EMILY

Leave a Comment

Filed under News and Administration, Op Ed

Reader Polls: Job Offers and Men’s Neckties

Hi Readers!

Please help me answer two questions.

The other day my husband asked if anyone had written to me to say that Hiring Librarians helped them find work.  I’ve heard from a few people, but I wanted to ask the rest of you.  If you want to share more of your story, please feel free to do so in the comments!  Of course, if you’ve found a job, you may no longer be reading…

And of course our poor manbrarians have been asking for information on what to wear for interviews.  So I thought I could at least ask:

So thanks for reading, readers, and participating in these polls!  I hope if you were in the Frankenstorm, that you came through it ok. I hope that all your election wishes came true.

And finally, I hope your career is taking off!  The Library of Congress thinks that Librarian Job Growth is Exploding! Also, did you see the current issue of American Libraries?  It includes articles on job searching – check out the sidebar to see our name in a print source!

Anyway, take care!

Emily

Leave a Comment

Filed under News and Administration, Op Ed, What Should Candidates Wear?

Library 2.012 for Job Hunters

Do you know about the Library 2.012 conference?

Co-founded by my alma mater, the key concept for this conference is “inclusive.”  There are over 150 presentations from all over the globe, covering a wide range of today’s (and tomorrow’s) library issues.  Best of all, it’s FREE!  You won’t even occur any travel costs, because the content is all delivered virtually to you in the comfort of your own home or office.

I combed through the 150 presentations and picked out four which look particularly relevant to job hunters.  You can click on the link to learn more about them, and you can figure out when they will be presented by looking at the schedule.  I don’t really know anything more about these, so I’m not endorsing them, just pointing them out, ok?

Campaigning for a Library Job: Maximizing Professional Development Opportunities to Differentiate Yourself From Other Applicants

Presented by Suzanna Conrad, Digital Initiatives Librarian, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

In tough economic times it can be daunting to even get interviews, much less land a job.  The library field has been heavily impacted by budget cuts and the stagnated economy. How can new librarians navigate the limited opportunities and still differentiate themselves from the hundreds of applications many HR departments are receiving for one position? Within this presentation, the co-presenters will talk about their “campaigns” to find full-time professional librarian positions in two different types of institutions and how they augmented their resumes with professional development activities such as association and committee involvement, publications and speaking engagements to differentiate themselves from other applicants.  The presentation will also address the importance of professional development involvement to the future of the profession.

Social Media Trifecta: Tools for Your Job Search

Presented by Africa Hands, Librarian/Information Professional, Hands On Research Solutions

Librarians have been using social media for several years to promote their services and institution. This presentation will focus on ways librarians can use social media for self-promotion and career advancement. Presenters will discuss how to take your blog efforts from soap box and sounding board to sales and professional marketing material; how to use LinkedIn to build online relationships, find opportunities, and demonstrate expertise; and provide an overview for setting up and using your Twitter profile to network and mine the Internet for employment opportunities.

Librarians A-Twitter: how to use Twitter for networking and professional development

Presented by Elizabeth Psyck, Liaison Librarian, Grand Valley State University

This session will look at what Twitter is and how librarians across the country are currently using it to meet and keep in touch with colleagues and participate in events. This will not be a discussion of how to use Twitter to promote your library and its services. The emphasis is on personal/professional development and networking. Different types of accounts (personal and/or professional; anonymous/semi-anonymous/named) will be discussed along with the benefits and drawbacks of each. New users will learn what Twitter is and how to use it. More advanced users will get tips on how to develop personal learning networks and participate in conversations with colleagues. Strategies for finding accounts to follow, how to participate in discussions, and how to keep from being overrun with spam will be presented. Participation in conferences and events via Twitter will be demonstrated.

Leadership and Career Success for the 21st Century Information Professional

Presented by Lisa Chow, Library Journal Mover & Shaker, People Interact

Anyone can be a leader. You don’t need to be in a leadership position to develop leadership skills. In three simple and easy to remember concepts, participants will learn valuable tips, tricks and tools for paving the way to leadership and career success in the 21st century.
Objectives:
1. Participants will conduct an individualized career analysis.
2. Participants will receive an overview of useful tips and tools.
3. Participants will be equipped with practical career strategies that can be implemented immediately.

And oh by the way!  Because I know you appreciate shameless self-promotion:

I'm presenting 2.012

I’m presenting!

My former classmate Sarah Naumann and I will be presenting the results of our study of the way that San Francisco Bay Area libraries use on-call librarians.  It will take place on October 3rd at 7PM Pacific.  Come and check it out!  It’s my first time ever presenting at a conference, so only the most gentle of heckling, please. When the conference has started, this link should take you directly to our presentation:

https://sas.elluminate.com/d.jnlp?sid=2008350&password=L20Part60

Will you be presenting, attending, or volunteering?  Leave a comment and let us know!

Leave a Comment

Filed under News and Administration, Op Ed

A Free Webinar, An Announcement, and A Not Too Ranty Rant

Hello Friends, Family, and Those Who Cannot Be Named,

FIRST

(This is the webinar)

Remember Megan Hodge and Nicole Spoor, who wrote a guest post based on their research into library hiring?  They are co-presenting a LLAMA webinar entitled: 

How to succeed in an entry-level librarian interview: Research and experience-based tips.

It takes place on Wednesday, July 25th from 1:30-3:00PM CDT. You can register here.  It’s FREE, and sounds like a great opportunity to learn more about their work, as well as get some tips and insight.

 

SECOND

(This is the announcement)

I now have four jobs.  I know, I know, I shouldn’t try to take ALL the jobs; I should leave some for everyone else.  But you see one job is temporary and will end in August,and the others are on-call positions at public libraries near me.  So together they kind of make one job, but without those pesky benefits.

I’m telling you this for two reasons:

1) To disclose that I’m much less of an actively-job-hunting-librarian now and more of a trying-to-juggle-multiple-jobs-while-keeping-an-eye-out-for-the-perfect-position-librarian. 

2) To publicize my Facebook group for on-call librarians.  If you are an on-call, hourly, pool, temporary part time, or othersuch librarian, or if you know one, or if you’ve hired one, or if you’re a student who thinks she might be working in this kind of position when she gets out, please join us and forward the link to anyone who might be interested: http://www.facebook.com/groups/librarianpool/

One of the things we’re working on is a collaborative document with all the different questions to ask when you get to a new library.

THIRD

(this is the hopefully not too ranty rant)

This is not an advice blog.  Granted, a lot of the interviewees do give you advice.  But really, what do you know about them?  Most of them are anonymous.  I don’t even know who most of them are – not even an IP address. Don’t ever take an individual interview as gospel.  It’s just some person, some random person, who hopefully wasn’t lying when they filled out the survey.

This blog isn’t about telling you what you should or shouldn’t do while applying for jobs.  This blog is to give you more information when you make your own decisions about how you will conduct your job search and yourself. Perhaps that’s a silly distinction, I don’t know. To me it’s different.

Library hiring managers/committees/etc. are a group of real, flawed people, who have all kinds of strange and varied opinions, but who also share a few common and perhaps not particularly describable or enumerable values. I hope this blog helps to illuminate that.

I have heard people express frustration that they are not getting a consistent message here.  But really, there just isn’t one, because this is not an advice blog.  It’s just the opinions of a bunch of different people.  Yesterday I posted an interview from someone who said their hiring process moved faster and “those who apply quickly get more consideration.”  Contrast that with “First Reponders That Don’t Personalize Appear Needy Not Qualified.”   @katecythr pointed out that while Tuesday’s survey told us “The Cover Letter is the Most Important Document. It May be the Only Thing I Read“, a survey last month said not to bother with the cover letter because the interviewee only wanted to look at resumes. Opinions.  Everyone has them. 

If you’ve found more opposites, let me know.  Maybe I’ll do a post of dueling interviews.

I actually find these inconsistancies encouraging.  You can be yourself and still find work.  The real bonus to the variation in approaches to library hiring is that somewhere out there you could probably find your perfect library job soul mate, and your perfect library job soul mate will think the same sorts of things are important in hiring and like you just as you are, just as long as you have had a shower somewhat recently.

Finally, I really want to encourage dialogue.  But sometimes I have trouble with how angry people get in the comments. Which I guess happens on any blog, but it makes me feel a bit defensive on behalf of the people who have done the interviews.  They’ve taken time out from their work to help me as a blogger and us as job hunters.  I sometimes think about just deleting those comments, but ultimately I’ve approved all of them. I know it’s frustrating to job hunt but you’re making me uncomfortable.

That uncomfortableness is my own fault though I think, for having soft, feeling insides. I don’t want you to stop expressing your frustrations.  Job hunting sucks, dudes. 

:D

/end rant. Thanks for your indulgence. If you want to discuss anything in the comments, please do feel free.  It helps me be a better person.

20 Comments

Filed under News and Administration, Op Ed

I wrote an article

…for LISCareer!

Please check it out: http://liscareer.com/weak_hiring.htm

If you haven’t already looked through their collection of articles from professional librarians on a variety of career topics, you should take a look while you’re there.  There are really a lot of gems, and chances are that someone has written something which directly applies to the particulars of your unique situation.  The index by date is here: http://liscareer.com/articlesbydate.htm

Leave a Comment

Filed under News and Administration, Op Ed

Tell Me My Math is Wrong, Because I Don’t Like These Numbers

So I have a Google Alert for the phrase “Hiring Librarians,” not just because I am vain and want to know when people are talking about me, but because it sends me a little sampling of the Google zeitgeist for library hiring issues. Yesterday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ recently updated page on the Occupational Outlook for Librarians popped onto my radar.

What first struck me is the figure that library jobs are expected to grow 7% from 2010 to 2020.  Although this is slower than the average growth rate for jobs, this actually seems high to me. It may be cynicism coupled with months of underemployment, but when I think of the job market for librarians, I feel like we are treading water.  Sure, there are a few new positions being created for web, assessment, and user experience librarians, but our profession has suffered massive cutbacks over the past few decades. I have spoken with staff at libraries that have been inversely decimated: only one out of ten librarians has been left standing.  This is just my personal feeling though, and I have no desire to argue with my beloved Bureau of Labor Statistics.

When I asked Twitter if the figure felt right to other librarians, @librarian_lali responded by wondering about the growth rate of library school graduates.  Good question!

I took a quick look at the annual review for my alma mater, SJSU SLIS, and found that there were 676 of us 2011 graduates (page 3…if you flip a little bit further you will find me being totally *famous* on page 22).  The BLS’ 7% growth figure translates to 10,800 new jobs.  If SJSU holds steady at 676 a year, that means 6,760 new librarians will be created from this one program alone.  Leaving 4,040 spots to be split by ten years worth of graduates from the other 57 ALA accredited library schools.

To look at another figure, Library Journal’s Annual Placements and Salaries Survey (2011) includes 38 schools, which have a total of 4,790 2010 graduates.  This total is much more ominous, because even in its incompleteness, it leaves us with a surplus of 37,100 new jobless graduates over that ten year period.  Of course some librarians might retire, if they decide their retirement funds have bounced back or that they can’t bear to explain Boolean searching even one more time.

While I was thinking about this, I came across Brett Bonfield’s piece Is the United States Training Too Many Librarians or Too Few? (Part 1) at In the Library with the Lead Pipe. He has more statistics, from different places, including one that puts the number of positions opening due to attrition as 42,000.  So maybe there is a bigger sliver of hope for surplus librarians after all.  And you know they do peer review and stuff over there, so they’re perhaps a little more authoritative.  Still pretty bleak though, right?

My big question is not, “are we training too many librarians?” but “what are we doing about creating more librarian jobs?”  Are there library leaders out there who are looking for ways to create new positions? Or are they so snowed under with fighting for libraries that losing personnel is a lesser of two evils? Will the last librarians standing continue to work longer and longer hours trying desperately to show their communities that libraries are relevant and valuable?

Here’s my thinking.  Libraries and books are synonymous in the public mind. But as we move beyond the physical to the digital, and as we leave behind the necessity for the corporeal trappings of libraries, what is left behind is librarians. We need to shift our thinking, and the thinking of the public, to the idea that the library is in the librarian.  We know that librarianship is service profession.  That service is where the value of our future libraries lies.  Libraries without librarians will not, in fact, be particularly relevant or valuable. It’s not just the books; Librarians are a public good.  We need to fight for new jobs, and not just cling to the last scraps of funding for decaying warehouses.

Who do you know of that is fighting for librarians?  What are we doing about creating more librarian jobs?

7 Comments

Filed under Op Ed