Tag Archives: Librarian

“All librarian work is required to be performed on-site, even virtual programs.”

Caroline Burnite Walker. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Please note: this is an anonymous response to an online survey; I do not have any way of contacting the respondent or verifying responses. Their answers may reflect good, bad, or middling hiring practices. I invite you to take what’s useful and leave the rest. If you are someone who hires Library, Archives or other LIS workers, please consider giving your own opinion by filling out the survey here

This anonymous interview is with someone who hires for a:

√ Public Library 

Title: Librarian Supervisor

Titles hired include: Librarian

Who makes hiring decisions at your organization:

√ The position’s supervisor 

Which of the following does your organization regularly require of candidates?

√ Online application

√ Cover letter

√ Resume 

√ Proof of degree 

√ More than one round of interviews 

Does your organization use automated application screening? 

√ No 

Briefly describe the hiring process at your organization and your role in it:

HR posts and distributes a job posting and shares all applications with the hiring committee, who chooses the candidates HR calls for an initial screening to confirm continued interest. Final interviews are held by a hiring committee that includes the position’s supervisor and the unit’s manager.

Think about the last candidate who really wowed you, on paper, in an interview, or otherwise. Why were they so impressive?

The candidate’s resume showed they had performed similar duties for a similar population and also showed they understood the nature of the role and made a persuasive argument for why they would be a good fit for the role.

Do you have any instant dealbreakers?

Lacking the legally required master’s degree in library science. Submitting resumes and cover letters that clearly are aimed at a different position (for instance, archivist or young adult specialist).

What do you wish you could know about candidates that isn’t generally revealed in the hiring process?

Their level of interest in the role — surprisingly, most candidates don’t express curiosity about the role, don’t ask questions, and don’t make a persuasive argument that the specifics of the role are appealing to them.

How many pages should each of these documents be?

Cover Letter: √ Only One!  

Resume: √ As many as it takes, but keep it reasonable and relevant 

CV: √ We don’t ask for this  

What is the most common mistake that people make in an interview?

Failing to make a case for themselves, by articulating a persuasive argument that they are a good fit for the role. Failing to ask questions that demonstrate they have a genuine interest in the details of the role.

Do you conduct virtual interviews? What do job hunters need to know about shining in this setting?

No

How can candidates looking to transition from paraprofessional work, from non-library work, or between library types convince you that their experience is relevant? Or do you have other advice for folks in this kind of situation?

A candidate can persuade us by providing specific examples of instances where they have performed similar duties, for a similar audience, in a similar setting.

When does your organization *first* mention salary information?

√ It’s part of the job ad 

What does your organization do to reduce bias in hiring? What are the contexts in which discrimination still exists in this process?

The hiring committee doesn’t see any demographic information about candidates.

What questions should candidates ask you? What is important for them to know about your organization and the position you are hiring for?

Candidates should be willing to ask for clarification about the role to demonstrate what they understand and don’t understand about it and to express curiosity about the role. 

Additional Demographics

What part of the world are you in?

√ Northeastern US 

What’s your region like?

√ Urban 

Is your workplace remote/virtual?

√ Other: All librarian work is required to be performed on-site, even virtual programs.

How many staff members are at your organization?

√ 201+ 

Is there anything else you’d like to say, either to job hunters or to me, the survey author? 

Candidates should tailor their materials to the specifics of the role, to show they are a good match.

Hey, thanks for reading! If you like reading, why not try commenting or sharing? 

Leave a comment

Filed under A Return to Hiring Librarians Survey

Your Supported Job Search: A Class for Job Hunters and other cool links and news

Hi Friends and Colleagues!

Help for Your Job Search: A Hiring Librarians Class

I’ve been interested in teaching a Hiring Librarians related course for a while and am excited to announce it’s finally becoming a reality!

You are invited to take the class! Your Supported Job Search is a four week online course that will run from May 20 to June 14, 2024. It’s being offered through ALA’s CORE and is free for CORE members. There are four (optional) Zoom meetings, in addition to activities and discussion.

This course is born out of the insights found in the more than 475 responses to the Job Hunter’s Survey. I found that 55% described themselves as “frustrated,” 43% described themselves as “somewhat depressed,” 16% as “despondent,” and 40% said they “felt alone in their search”. For even the most optimistic person, looking for work is challenging. You don’t have to do it alone.

This course will provide structure and support. The four modules cover:

  • Your Search Parameters: What you want and how it aligns with what’s out there
  • Your Strengths: What you bring to the table (including developing or polishing your resume/CV)
  • Your Process: Larger strategies and the nitty gritty of how to remember and track what you apply for
  • Your Well Being: Self-care and community-care in your job search

It is appropriate for library and LIS workers in all library types and organizations, and at any level of career. I hope you will join us!

Resource Reminder

Have you been on a library interview recently? Or are you prepping for one? Don’t forget about the interview questions repository! As of today, people have shared questions from 583 interview, in all library types and levels. This spreadsheet is a decade old! Help keep it current and robust by sharing the questions you were asked in your recent interview.

You can find this and other resources, such as salary transparency information and lists of places to look for work, on the Hiring Librarians Resources page.

The Podcast

There are 11 episodes with 9 guests in Season One. We’re taking a break for March and April, but Season two should return in May. It’s available on SpotifyApple PodcastsYouTube music and other various podcasting sites (let me know if you can’t find it on your preferred platform).

If you have a suggestion for a show, or you’d like to be on the show yourself, please get in touch! For Season One transcripts, look here.

LIS Career Coaches Series

Several posts interviewing folks who offer career coaching in our field are out. They’ll post on Tuesdays until I run out of coaches to feature. If you’re a coach and you’d like to be featured, please reach out to me. Keep reading for all the ways you can connect with me…

Chat, Connect, or Follow on Way Too Many Social Media Sites

You can always email me at hiringlibrarians AT gmail or comment on one of the posts (remember when commenting used to be a thing and there were good discussions in the comments? That did happen)

If you’d like the content to come to you, you can subscribe via email or within the WordPress.com platform. Those are both available in the right sidebar, as are links to almost all of the social medias listed below.

Hiring Librarians is also on the following:

Thank you!

Thanks so much for reading and supporting this site. One more link for you:

  • Patreon: hiringlibrarians (read more about this site’s finances and other ways to participate here)

Best,

Emily

Leave a comment

Filed under News and Administration

A Survey (not mine) and Resources You Will Like

Hi Friends and Colleagues!

First, Take this Survey!

I was recently contacted by Teresa Hebron over at the University of Utah and she asked me to share this Call for Participation:

Are you a librarian who has taken a break of six months or longer before returning to librarianship? This
study by University of Utah librarians examines the motivations of library professionals for leaving
and/or reentering library settings. Please consider taking our short (15-30 minute) survey and share your
experiences so that we can use the information to better support those re-entering the library
profession. Our study is available here: https://tinyurl.com/uurentrystudy

Please share your experiences and help improve the field!

Resource Reminder

Have you been on a library interview recently? Or are you prepping for one? Don’t forget about the interview questions repository! As of today, people have shared questions from 583 interview, in all library types and levels. This spreadsheet is a decade old! Help keep it current and robust by sharing the questions you were asked in your recent interview.

You can find this and other resources, such as salary transparency information and lists of places to look for work, on the Hiring Librarians Resources page.

2024 State of the LIS Job Market

183 people who hire LIS workers took the survey! It’s still open, so if you hire library or LIS workers and are interested in sharing your opinions, please take it.

In the meantime, I’ve started analyzing results. So far I’ve posted about the one word that folks would use to describe someone they want to hire, demographics of respondents, and (hopefully) where we post our job ads. Check it out, it’s interesting stuff!

You can also read individual responses here.

The Podcast

There are 11 episodes with 9 guests in Season One. We’re taking a break for March and April, but Season two should return in May. It’s available on SpotifyApple PodcastsYouTube music and other various podcasting sites (let me know if you can’t find it on your preferred platform).

If you have a suggestion for a show, or you’d like to be on the show yourself, please get in touch! For Season One transcripts, look here.

Upcoming CORE Course

I’m currently developing a four week course for CORE called Your Supported Job Search. It’s scheduled for May – stay tuned for more details.

LIS Career Coaches Series

The first two posts from a look at folks who offer career coaching in our field are out. They’ll post on Tuesdays until I run out of coaches to feature. If you’re a coach and you’d like to be featured, please reach out to me. Keep reading for all the ways you can connect with me…

Chat, Connect, or Follow on Way Too Many Social Media Sites

You can always email me at hiringlibrarians AT gmail or comment on one of the posts (remember when commenting used to be a thing and there were good discussions in the comments? That did happen)

If you’d like the content to come to you, you can subscribe via email or within the WordPress.com platform. Those are both available in the right sidebar, as are links to almost all of the social medias listed below.

Hiring Librarians is also on the following:

Thank you!

Thanks so much for reading and supporting this site. One more link for you:

  • Patreon: hiringlibrarians (read more about this site’s finances and other ways to participate here)

Best,

Emily

Leave a comment

Filed under News and Administration

Author’s Corner: The Dysfunctional State of Library Workplaces and the LIS Profession

Welcome back to Author’s Corner! This series features excerpts or guest posts from authors of books about LIS careers. 

In this installment, we hear from Spencer Acadia, the editor of a book on dysfunction in LIS. As you will see in reading, Spencer is committed to naming and documenting harmful patterns in LIS. This is a first step in changing our work for the better.

If you’re interested in reading beyond this post, the citation for the book is:

Acadia, S. (Ed.). (2023). Libraries as dysfunctional organizations and workplaces. Routledge.


Libraries and the LIS profession are dysfunctional. You might think a blog about hiring librarians wouldn’t need to discuss this issue because, after all, the concept of “vocational awe” says that librarianship is sacred and shouldn’t be criticized—including its hiring practices, right…? Wrong. Libraries and the LIS profession are not immune to problems, and we must be ready and willing to critique both the institutions themselves and their multitude of issues. Examining libraries through the lens of dysfunction reveals unsettling concerns and outcomes, including problematic aspects of hiring and the experiences of the once-excited new employee who soon discovers they’ve signed on to work in a dysfunctional library or archives.

Throughout my decade in academic libraries (2008–2018), I realized a troubling trend: libraries, especially in academia, are dysfunctional. This conclusion wasn’t formed only from my own disheartening experiences, however, as distressed colleagues, online discussions, mounting research, and critical publications all highlighted a profession in peril. In 2022, I put together a book on the topic to further ignite conversations about this emerging topic of LIS dysfunction.

Dysfunction in LIS seems to be especially prevalent in library workplaces. This dysfunction isn’t about the occasional bad day or the intermittent annoyances of work life. Rather, LIS workplace dysfunction can be thought of as patterns of harmful behaviors, conditions, and dynamics that create and maintain destructive work environments. Although much current discourse about this dysfunction pertains to the workplace, is not limited to the workplace. LIS dysfunction may also appear in LIS education and library schools, at LIS conferences, and throughout other aspects of the discipline and profession.

Dysfunction in LIS can be described in a three-pronged approach; that is, comprised of and evident in three distinct but overlapping parts: 1) individual (i.e., person-based); 2) organizational (i.e., institution-based); and 3) disciplinary (i.e., based in the profession itself). Examples include:

  • Individual: Rude behavior, condescension, gossip, retaliation, aggression, bullying, and improper body language
  • Organizational: Lack of time and resources for employees to complete work, pressure to “do more with less,” frequent restructuring, poor communication, excessive workload, lack of autonomy, unclear job roles and reward systems, internal cultural of competition, and insufficient onboarding and mentoring
  • Disciplinary: Library schools’ failure to teach essential social skills, and professional associations’ inaction on diversity, equity, inclusion, justice, accessibility, ethics, and corruption; and an exploitative job market, including use of precarious labor

The above is not an exhaustive list by any means, but merely represents some of the various actions and conditions that make up dysfunction in LIS. As a result of this dysfunction, damaging outcomes are commonplace at the individual and organizational level.

  • For librarians and archivists: Reduced happiness, job satisfaction, productivity, as well as increased absenteeism, negative mental and physical health issues (e.g., anxiety, depression, burnout, etc.)
  • For LIS organizations: Disempowerment and alienation of workers, loss of talent and institutional knowledge, potential lawsuits, poor leadership, toxic work culture, and low morale

Again, these outcomes are not exhaustive; they only signify some of the many consequences of the runaway dysfunction currently afflicting LIS. Moreover, it is useful to think of the relationship between dysfunction and its outcomes as cyclical because the outcomes themselves cycle back into the dysfunction from which they arose in the first place. For example, if a workplace operates under a constant “do more with less” mantra, employees are likely to experience heightened stress, frustration, unhappiness, irritability, and so on. These undesired outcomes, in turn, sustain dysfunctional environments because of their adverse impacts on the individual and the individual’s interactions in the workplace. Indeed, this cycle of dysfunction is self-perpetuating, and a fundamental shift in the profession is needed if meaningful change and improvement is to happen.

So, what are the solutions to solve the ills of LIS dysfunction? Potential solutions, both theoretical and practical, can be found in the existing LIS literature, albeit most of these remain untested and evidence-based results are spotty at best. That said, exploring literature in other disciplines that cover workplace topics (e.g., psychology, sociology, business management and leadership, etc.) yields more robust evidence of and insights about dysfunction across many different types of workplaces.

Research on dysfunction in LIS specifically is burgeoning, meaning that it is not yet fully developed and is far from reaching maturity. What’s needed is more research on the forms of dysfunction occurring in LIS and the outcomes it produces at individual, organizational, and disciplinary levels with the explicit aim to:

  • Identify, acknowledge, and expose widespread dysfunction
  • Document its negative impacts on individuals, institutions, and the profession itself

Once this begins to occur at a larger scale only then can widespread solutions be realistically created and applied towards positively transforming library workplaces, schools, associations, conferences, and other LIS environments. Toward this end, a new long-term project is soon to be launched that will continue bringing much-needed attention to dysfunction in LIS.


Spencer Acadia holds a PhD in sociology, along with master’s degrees in both psychology and library science. Spencer currently works as an assistant professor at the library and information science (LIS) school at the University of Denver. Spencer teaches social science research methods in LIS contexts, global LIS research and practice, and library and collection management. Prior to becoming a professor, Spencer worked for 10 years as an academic librarian. One of Spencer’s primary research interests is dysfunction in LIS, and published the book Libraries as Dysfunctional Organizations and Workplaces in 2022. More about Spencer’s work is available at https://www.spenceracadia.com.

Leave a comment

Filed under Author's Corner

Stats and Graphs: “I want to hire someone who is __________________.”

This is the second of an unknown number of posts that will present statistics and results from the 2024 State of the Job Market survey. Please note I don’t use representative sampling, so it would be inappropriate to draw conclusions about the larger population of LIS Workers as a whole. These stats posts take forever to write, so unfortunately I’m generally neither timely nor thorough with getting them out.

The 2024 State of the Job Market survey collects information from people who hire library and other LIS workers on current hiring practices, their most recent recruitment, and a few other key details about their workplace and personal characteristics and opinions. There are 39 questions (all optional) in 4 sections. It is an update of my 2015 survey on the state of the library job market.

I opened the survey on February 8th, 2024. It will remain open indefinitely, but as of March 7th the response rate has trickled to a near halt. There are 183 responses. Most chose to fill it out anonymously; only 14 people left contact information (about 8%).

For context, the 2015 State of the Job Market Survey ran from January 6, 2015 until I shut down the blog in late January 2016. There were 27 questions (all optional). I gathered 269 responses. The bulk of those (254) came in that first month. 31 people left contact information (about 11%).


Question 15 asks, “I want to hire someone who is __________________.” Please fill in the blank with one (and only one) adjective

As promised, this post will include a word cloud! Cheesy, but highly illustrative, just like yours truly.

171 out of 183 respondents answered this question. Of those, 155 responded with just one word, or a few words that represented just one concept that I felt comfortable hyphenating. In the cloud above, the smallest font are words that appeared just once while the larger font represents the twenty four responses that showed up more than once. Those twenty four responses were:

WordNumber who chosePercent who chose
Enthusiastic158.1%
Flexible116%
Curious105.4%
Adaptable94.9%
Competent94.9%
Motivated63.2%
Personable42.1%
Capable42.1%
Teachable42.1%
Self-motivated42.1%
Dependable42.1%
Positive31.6%
Emotionally-Intelligent31.6%
Qualified31.6%
Trainable31.6%
Passionate31.6%
Reliable31.6%
Engaging21%
Creative21%
Hard-working21%
Communicative21%
Engaged21%
Knowledgeable21%
Detail-Oriented21%

You can see that some of these words are related, for example “Teachable” and “Trainable” and “Dependable” and “Reliable.” If I group related words (a subjective exercise), I get the frequencies below

Word(s)Number who chosePercent who chose
Eager, energetic, engaged, Enthusiastic, Excited, Excited-to-work-here, Motivated, passionate, positive3318%
adaptable, flexible2010.9%
Capable, Competent137.1%
approachable, customer-service-oriented, Engaging, Kid-friendly, Personable, relatable116%
Curious, inquisitive116%
eager-to-learn, interested-in-learning, learner, Teachable, trainable, willing-to-be-mentored116%
conscientious, Dependable, reliable84.3%
Experienced, Knowledgeable, qualified63.2%
collaborative, collegial, compatible, cooperative, team-player52.7%
Emotionally-Intelligent, empathetic, kind52.7%
Intelligent, sharp, smart, thoughtful42.1%
self-motivated42.1%
Creative, innovative31.6%
detail-oriented, Meticulous31.6%
Forward-thinking, prepared, proactive31.6%
communicative21%
hard-working21%
Practical, realistic21%
versatile, well-rounded21%
analytical10.5%
boundary-holding10.5%
Concise10.5%
discrete10.5%
exactly-like-me10.5%
goal-driven10.5%
mature10.5%

Some things I am thinking about

In 2024, Enthusiasm and teachability seem to be more valued than experience and knowledge.

The team player v. good customer service categories are a little fuzzy (ok, a lot of categories are fuzzy). For example, “relatable” might be something you look for in coworker but I put it in the customer service category.

As a somewhat slapdash individual, I’m happy to see that while meticulous and detail-oriented do show up, it’s not anywhere near the most frequent. Also, take that librarian stereotypes!

I would like to ask the person who wrote “exactly like me” to consider reading up on EDI in the workplace. One quick way to do this would be to look at organizational EDI statements, for example – San Jose Public LibrarySeattle Public LibraryUCI LibrariesUCLA. UCLA in particular might be helpful if you haven’t yet decided that equity is in and of itself valuable.

Comparing with 2015 Results

As I mentioned earlier, I ran a similar survey in 2015, which asked the same question. There was definitely overlap in the most common responses – enthusiasm/passionate, adaptable/flexible, and competent. However, in 2015, “qualified” was actually the most frequently chosen response! Here is a word cloud of the 2015 choices:

The most common responses in 2015, with number who chose, is below:

WordNumber who ChosePercent Who Chose
Qualified186.7%
Passionate134.8%
Adaptable124.5%
Enthusiastic114.1%
Competent93.3%
Flexible72.6%
Innovative72.6%
Motivated62.2%
Personable62.2%
Team-Player62.2%
Capable51.9%
Curious51.9%
Customer Service Oriented51.9%
Excited51.9%
Engaged41.5%
Friendly41.5%
Self-Motivated41.5%
Smart41.5%

This survey is still open. If you are someone who hires library or LIS workers and you’d like to take it, click here.

Up next in stats posts: Question 1. Where do you advertise your job listings?

1 Comment

Filed under 2024 State of the Job Market Stats, 2024 State of the Library Job Market, Stats and Graphs

Stats and Graphs: State of the Job Market Survey Demographics

This is the first of an unknown number of posts that will present statistics and results from the 2024 State of the Job Market survey. Please note I don’t use representative sampling, so it would be inappropriate to draw conclusions about the larger population of LIS Workers as a whole. These stats posts take forever to write, so unfortunately I’m generally neither timely nor thorough with getting them out.

The 2024 State of the Job Market survey collects information from people who hire library and other LIS workers on current hiring practices, their most recent recruitment, and a few other key details about their workplace and personal characteristics and opinions. There are 39 questions (all optional) in 4 sections. It is an update of my 2015 survey on the state of the library job market.

I opened the survey on February 8th, 2024. It will remain open indefinitely, but as of March 7th the response rate seems to have trickled to a near halt. There are 183 responses. Most chose to fill it out anonymously; only 14 people left contact information (about 8%).

For context, the 2015 State of the Job Market Survey ran from January 6, 2015 until I shut down the blog in late January 2016. There were 27 questions (all optional). I gathered 269 responses. The bulk of those (254) came in that first month. 31 people left contact information (about 11%).


In this post I primarily want to provide the demographics of respondents so future stats posts will have the context of whose answers we are reading.

Question 34 asks “What type of institution do you hire for? (check all that apply)”

I provided 6 choices: Academic Library, Archives, Library Vendor/Service Provider, Public Library, School Library, Special Library and Other. People could choose all answers that applied. 26 people picked two answers (17 of those were Academic Library & Archives) and 3 people picked three answers.

Institution TypePercent Who ChoseNumber Who Chose
Academic Library49.2%90
Public Library38.8%71
Archives15.3%28
Special Library7.1%13
Other3.8%7
School Library2.2%4
Vendor/Service Provider0.5%1
No Answer0.5%1

The “Other” responses were filled in with: State, State Library, Health Service, Government Department, Government – Records & information management, Business Library, and Library School.

You can see that Academic Library workers were just under 50% of respondents, followed by public library at about 40%. This is generally typical of my responses. My suspicion is that this is for two main reasons: there are more folks working in academic and public libraries than in other organization types and research is a larger focus for academic library folks, so they do more surveys.

Question 36 asks “Are you a librarian?”

Options were: Yes, No, It’s complicated, and Other.

Are you a librarian?Percent Who ChoseNumber Who Chose
Yes84.2%154
Other9.8%18
It’s Complicated4.4%8
No1.6%3

The majority of respondents identify as a librarian. Nine of the Other responses wrote in that they were an archivist. My favorite of these was “Yes, I have my MLS but I identify as an archivist which tends to irritate librarians for some reason.” Curse those pesky archivists! Another answer expressing a librarian/archivist tension “Fraught! I’m classified as a librarian but my title is archivist.” The other “Other” answers were:

  • Currently director level, but trained as a librarian
  • Director of library, archives, IT applications
  • I guess I could have chosen ‘it’s complicated’ but I’m a librarian with public librarian certification who also has a PhD and now teaches full time in an MLIS program. I don’t know if this makes me a librarian in addition to a lecturer or if you’d prefer I just said ‘lecturer’
  • I manage a branch but still consider myself a librarian
  • Librarian and Library Manager
  • Library Director -15 years, Library Staff – 30 years, finishing MLS in May
  • Library manager
  • No, but i am qualified to be one.
  • Work as circulation manager. do not have my masters but have been in public libraries for 15 years

Question 37 asks “Are you now or have you ever been:” (check all that apply)

Yes, that is a McCarthyism joke, and yes I know I’m the only person in the world who thinks it’s funny. Options are “A hiring manager (you are hiring people that you will directly or indirectly supervise),” “A member of a hiring or search committee,” “Human Resources,” and “Other”

RolePercent Who ChoseNumber Who Chose
A hiring manager (you are hiring people that you will directly or indirectly supervise)90.7%166
A member of a hiring or search committee87.4%160
Human Resources6.6%12
Other0.5%1
No Answer0.5%1

These are pretty straightforward. The vast majority of respondents are hiring managers and have also served on a hiring or search committee. The one “Other” answer wrote in that they were administration.

Question 32 asks “What part of the world are you in?”

There were ten choices for this question: Australia/New Zealand, Canada, Mid-Atlantic US, Midwestern US, Northeastern US, Southeastern US, Southwestern US, UK, Western US (including Alaska, Hawaii and Pacific Northwest) and Other.

Where in worldPercent Who ChoseNumber Who Chose
Midwestern US23%42
Southeastern US19.7%36
Western US (including Alaska, Hawaii and Pacific Northwest)16.4%30
Mid-Atlantic US12.6%23
Northeastern US10.4%19
Southwestern US8.7%16
Other4.4%8
Canada2.2%4
No answer1.1%2
Australia/New Zealand1.1%2
UK0.5%1

So most respondents were from the US (91%), which makes sense because so am I, and that’s mostly where I posted calls for responses (although I did post on a few IFLA lists this time). Responses to “Other” also included people who didn’t feel like the US region choices represented them accurately as well as folks from outside the US. They were: Africa, Colorado – west edge of Midwest, Currently in Midwest but years of hiring in California, France, Ireland (x3), and West Kentucky.

And finally the last demographic –

Question 33 asks “What’s your region like? (check all that apply)”

Options for this question are: Urban area, Suburban area, Rural area, and other. Institutions often serve folks in more than one of these types of setting, so this is a “check all that apply” question.

Region TypePercent Who ChoseNumber Who Chose
Suburban Area49.2%90
Urban Area47%86
Rural Area29%53
Other3.8%7
No answer0.5%1

You can see that most folks chose suburban and/or urban. I don’t have much more to say about this question!


This survey is still open. If you are someone who hires library or LIS workers and you’d like to take it, click here.

Up nextin stats posts: Question 15. I want to hire someone who is ______. (Please fill in the blank with one (and only one) adjective). This post will include a word cloud. Oh boy!

1 Comment

Filed under 2024 State of the Job Market Stats, 2024 State of the Library Job Market, Stats and Graphs

Hiring Librarians Podcast S01 E11: Ray Pun

Note: This will be the last podcast episode for about a month!

My guest is Ray Pun. In this episode, we talk about his work in all the different kinds of libraries, the STAR method, and his candidacy for ALA president. Ray’s website is https://www.raypun.info/

Voting starts March 11th.

You can find an AI-generated and not completely error free transcript here.

This podcast is available on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, YouTube music and other various podcasting sites (let me know if you can’t find it on your preferred platform).

We are going on hiatus for the next month or so! I need to feel a little less busy, and then round up some new guests and maybe figure out a better microphone than the dinky one in my laptop. I’d love to hear your requests or other feedback for moving forward. And please do reach out if you want to be a guest!

Leave a comment

Filed under Podcast

Hiring Librarians Podcast S01 E10: Sam Helmick

My guest is Sam Helmick. In this episode, we talk about tarantulas, the importance of outreach, and oh yeah, their candidacy for ALA president. Sam’s website is samforlibraries.com

Voting starts March 11th.

An AI-generated and not completely error free transcript is available here. 

This podcast is available on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, YouTube music and other various podcasting sites (let me know if you can’t find it on your preferred platform). Next week my guest will be Sam’s opponent in this race, Ray Pun. After that, a short hiatus.

Leave a comment

Filed under Podcast

Hiring Librarians Podcast S01 E09: Snowden Becker (Part Two of Two)

My guest is Snowden Becker. The first part of this two part episode posted last week. In this episode, we talk about liveable! wages!, using her job hunting database, and the power of pets. Snowden has some links for you:

An AI-generated and not completely error free transcript is available here. 

This podcast is available on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, YouTube music and other various podcasting sites (let me know if you can’t find it on your preferred platform). Next week on episode 10, ALA Presidential Candidate Sam Helmick (with Ray Pun the following week).

Leave a comment

Filed under Podcast

Hiring Librarians Podcast S01 E08: Snowden Becker (Part One of Two)

My guest is Snowden Becker. In this episode, we talk about cataloging the internets, what it means when a job ad says “familiarity with,” and dumb old library Twitter. Snowden has some links for you:

An AI-generated and not completely error free transcript is available here. 

This podcast is available on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, YouTube music and other various podcasting sites (let me know if you can’t find it on your preferred platform). Next week on episode 8, Snowden Becker.

2 Comments

Filed under Podcast